|
canerino Registered: May 28, 2005 Total Posts: 5391 Country: United States |
|
|
DonCJohnson Registered: Jun 28, 2008 Total Posts: 59 Country: United States |
I suppose to be fair you will have to handicap yourself in some way as well. You can only shoot in "Green Square" mode, and stand on one leg during each shot. |
|
hardlyboring Registered: Apr 19, 2008 Total Posts: 145 Country: United States |
Just chimp a lot with a really disgusted look on your face and mumble under your breath how bad that last shot looked. This way the photog shooting the wedding will think your some loser with nice equipment and no clue what you are doing. This way everyone gets a laugh. |
|
venkman Registered: Jun 13, 2005 Total Posts: 181 Country: United States |
Unless the pro photog is completely self-absorbed, the only objection to you shooting would be if you are "stealing eyes" in the formals or setting up shop in the middle of an aisle (or other important location). Don't do that and you'll be fine. |
|
mauriceramirez Registered: Jul 16, 2004 Total Posts: 2414 Country: United States |
I agree with your assessment of this forum being unfair in portraying everyone with a camera as an Uncle Bob. Also, I agree with your implication that its disingenuous of photographers to label anyone with a nice camera at a wedding, when its really just their own feelings of insecurity creeping in. |
|
jasont Registered: Feb 15, 2008 Total Posts: 274 Country: United States |
You can introduce yourself to the main photographer and assure him that you will stay out of the way and be discreet. Maybe bring him a bottle of water or help him control the crowd during the formals. If you're going to be an Uncle Bob, at least be a likable one...if there is such a thing |
|
Andrew Welsh Registered: Jan 20, 2007 Total Posts: 1509 Country: United States |
Well, avoid jumping in the aisle after the couple is announced. Otherwise you'll end up on the uncle bob thread |
|
Tony Hoffer Registered: Mar 14, 2008 Total Posts: 948 Country: United States |
jasont wrote: |
|
Matt Khoury Registered: Jan 24, 2008 Total Posts: 641 Country: United States |
DonCJohnson wrote: |
|
Emile Gregoire Registered: Sep 09, 2004 Total Posts: 1659 Country: France |
Maurice is totally and utterly spot-on. |
|
Daniel K Registered: Feb 07, 2007 Total Posts: 389 Country: United States |
I suggest taking lots of pictures of the main photographer! |
|
asimsoofi Registered: Apr 26, 2006 Total Posts: 1541 Country: United States |
You know, you could just leave your camera at home, go to the party and actually have fun. I don't know...Just an idea. |
|
radioblurs Registered: Aug 26, 2005 Total Posts: 2178 Country: United States |
chuck |
|
hassy501 Registered: Jun 22, 2006 Total Posts: 2756 Country: United States |
There is nothing wrong with being discreet and staying out of the way.....but the uncle bob's that get tossed around this forum DON'T do that......they could care less about our WORK that we are being paid to do...........so we don't bash EVERYONE with a camera......just those who interfere. |
|
hassy501 Registered: Jun 22, 2006 Total Posts: 2756 Country: United States |
canerino wrote: |
|
canerino Registered: May 28, 2005 Total Posts: 5391 Country: United States |
thanks for all the tips everyone... |
|
canerino Registered: May 28, 2005 Total Posts: 5391 Country: United States |
hassy501 wrote: |
|
jefferies1 Registered: Jul 03, 2008 Total Posts: 313 Country: United States |
The bottom line is the more cameras around and in sight of the subject being photographer the more they look away and a great shot turns into a missed or average shot. "Uncle Bobs" also prevent the spontanious moments that make a good album when the bride or couple are alone and relaxed or just interacting. I never worry the quality of my images as they are well lit, well cropped and of print quality. It is the other factors I have no control over that take album images from just being well shot to full of feeling and emotion. More cameras around, mean less natural the interaction between the couple, less chances for good shots.I start working on this when doing the engagement and bridal shoot way before the wedding so they are used to my style on the wedding day.The weddings with big cameras all over the place never have as many "emotion" shots due to the distraction. In the end the client is the one hurt, not the photographer. Uncle Bob may get one good emotion shot while I would have got a dozen without the couple being distracted. As a professional I will always get my shots with or without Uncle Bobs using a pro camera or a P-S. It is just a lot easier to do the job I am paid for with less of them around. If you want wedding practice shots go volunteer as an assistant for someone in town. |
|
canerino Registered: May 28, 2005 Total Posts: 5391 Country: United States |
and hey, i like image quality just like the next guy...so why not use what I have? |
|
njjuliano Registered: Oct 21, 2003 Total Posts: 502 Country: United States |
You beat me to this topic. Good one to start. |
|
canerino Registered: May 28, 2005 Total Posts: 5391 Country: United States |
jefferies1 wrote: |
|
canerino Registered: May 28, 2005 Total Posts: 5391 Country: United States |
hey hassy, you have any point and shoots laying around you want to lend me? |
|
Photon Registered: Jan 19, 2003 Total Posts: 6698 Country: United States |
I agree with Maurice Ramirez' assessment, though jefferies1 also has a good point. I find that the sheer number of cameras being used at weddings makes it impossible to get certain types of broad view, atmosphere shots that really used to be a nice part of the wedding keepsake. |
|
formula4speed Registered: May 08, 2005 Total Posts: 1098 Country: United States |
Chuck, I'll go to the wedding as well with my 500L on the 1DII, throw on the 580EX with a better beamer and ever time I take a shot I'll loudly announce "Ohhhh yea, that's a keeper.". No one will even notice you are there |